Paper 2602.12670
SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks
- Published
- Feb 2026
- Research lab
- Independent
- Citations
- 174
- GitHub
- Not linked
01 In brief
Summary
SKILLSBENCH is a benchmark for evaluating Agent Skills, which are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time.
The benchmark contains 87 tasks across 8 domains, each with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers.
In an evaluation of 18 model–harness configurations, curated Skills raised the average pass rate from 33.9% to 50.5% (+16.6 percentage points; 25.5% normalized gain), with configuration-level gains ranging from +4.1 to +25.7 pp.
Focused Skills with at most three modules outperformed larger or exhaustive bundles, and smaller models with Skills could match larger models without them.
Self-generated Skills underperformed the no-Skills baseline on all three tested configurations.
The benchmark uses a paired evaluation framework (with vs.
without Skills) to isolate Skill efficacy from model and harness effects, and it is built on the BenchFlow containerized harness.
The paper also analyzes the Skill ecosystem, finding 2,014,000 source-partitioned Skills with a median bundle size of about 1.8k tokens, and provides detailed appendices on task construction, quality filtering, and experimental protocol.
02 From the paper
Abstract
Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment large language model (LLM) agents at inference time. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help. We present SkillsBench, a benchmark whose current inventory contains 87 tasks across 8 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers. Our latest aggregate evaluation runs the 87-task benchmark under matched no-Skills and curated-Skills conditions for 18 model-harness configurations. Curated Skills raise the average pass rate from 33.9% to 50.5% (+16.6 percentage points; 25.5% normalized gain), with configuration-level gains ranging from +4.1 to +25.7 pp. Focused Skills with at most three modules outperform larger or exhaustive bundles, and smaller models with Skills can match larger models without them. SkillsBench establishes paired evaluation as the foundation for rigorous measurement of Skill efficacy on agentic, expertise-heavy work.